Discussion Thread: This post << Part 4 << Part 3 << Part 2 << Part 1 (Also a contribution to the May Working/Learning blog carnival hosted by Rupa Rajagopalan) In the last few posts, I have tried to identify what I think are the pillars of the learning process/experience and tried to establish that they [...]
Archive for May, 2008
Part 4: Learning 2.0 Formal Methodologies
Posted in elearning 2.0, Learning Theory, tagged learning 2.0 on May 11, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
Discussion Thread: This post << Part 3 << Part 2 << Part 1 Before we go on to start detailing formal methodologies, we must make concrete the business case, context and critical success factors for these methodologies. As organizations struggle to understand how they can leverage Learning 2.0 and vendors bring in their own interpretations [...]
Part 3: Learning 2.0 Formal Methodologies
Posted in elearning 2.0, Learning Theory on May 3, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
Discussion Thread: This post << Part 2 << Part 1 I think the discussion regarding the dimensions of analysis of learning is useful, because (unlike the author) I think these are precisely where old-style (1.0) learning and new-style (2.0) are different. Take, for example, the whole idea of goals and measurements. To measure the ‘effectiveness’ [...]




